Ford vs Dell

In: Business and Management

Submitted By slinky
Words 410
Pages 2
Ford vs Dell
Executive Summary FORDs current method of controlling all aspects of the manufacturing is outdated and is limiting the corporation’s annual results. In order to stay competitive and become efficient again, FORD needs to re-evaluate their current supply chain and implement key portions of DELLs vertically integrated supply chain model.

A proper implementation will increase information flow between suppliers, departments and dealers resulting in a reduction of redundant inventory and focus towards just in time inventory. All of these factors will further drive up the already US industry leading profit margin per vehicle.

In order to accomplish these goals FORD needs to refocus the Purchasing department’s responsibilities, consolidate and develop suppliers that deliver finished high level components and increase the information flow across all points of the supply chain. These steps will help to introduce a more pull-based system.

Contents Issue identification 1 Environmental and root cause analysis 2 Alternatives/Options 3 Recommendations 4 Implementation 5 Monitor & Control 6

Issue identification
• Current order to delivery (OTD) is more than 60 days.
• Management of large supplier network.
• Utilization of IT is lacking.
• Purchasing isn’t integrated into Product development.
• Independent dealership network has resulted in FORDs loss of control over customer service experiences. This network also breeds FORD vs. FORD sales battles not a Global entity mindset. Environmental and root cause analysis FORDs existing supplier base is a direct product of historical business practice. As the company has grown and demand has increased they have just increased the supplier base. Historically suppliers had been selected based on part/component price within little to no regard to…...

Similar Documents

Ford vs Dell

...business that the Ford Motor Company has excelled in since 1903. Ford can never be virtually integrated like Dell but the Ford Company can adopt some of Dell’s concepts of virtual integration to strive for excellence in supply chain management. As Director of Supply Chain Systems, I am convinced that Ford can implement portions of Dell’s Virtual Integration strategy even though the Ford Company differs in many respects from Dell. A modification of the virtual integration system that Dell uses should be applied to Ford’s supplier base, distribution system, dealerships, and divisions. Issue Identification Ford must find ways to improve their supply chain management to compete in a global market and continue to retain its market share in an increasingly competitive, saturated and over capacitated US market. Ford must act now or risk losing market share. The main issue Ford must deal with is decreasing the volume and complexity of its supplier base as it is plagued with costly inefficiencies. Secondly, Ford must get closer to its customers to better understand their needs and wants and to create better forecasting of demand. Teri Takai must decide within a week if Ford should model its supply chain strategy close to Dell’s Virtual Integration. Environment and Root Cause Analysis The Ford Motor Company is the 2nd largest industrial corporation in the world with revenues of $144 billion. Ford employs over 370,000 employees and has operations in 200 countries. What Ford does......

Words: 1490 - Pages: 6

Ford and Dell

...INTRODUCCIÓN Ford y Dell dos empresas líderes y exitosas en industrias diferentes, una líder en la industria automotriz y la otra en la industria de computadoras. Dell con un modelo de negocio directo y simple y Ford con un sistema de negocio tradicional que tiene algunas deficiencias, que están perjudicando el desempeño de la empresa, teniendo que mejorar la cadena de suministro y hacer uso de una gran herramienta como es el internet. Michael Dell comenzó en el año de 1984 con una simple visión de negocios: él podría desviar el canal de vendedores a través del cual las computadoras personales estaban siendo vendidas. En lugar, él las vendería directamente a los clientes y crearía más productos para ordenar. En un solo movimiento, Dell eliminó la marca del intermediario y los costos y riesgos asociados con llevar a cabo grandes inventarios de bienes (artículos) terminados. La fórmula llegó a ser conocida como el modelo directo de negocios, y le proporcionó a la Corporación de Computadoras Dell una ventaja sustancial de costo. El modelo directo llegó a tener otros beneficios que aún Michael Dell no pudo haber anticipado cuando él fundó su compañía. “De hecho Usted tiene que tener una relación con el cliente”, explica. “Y eso crea información valiosa, la cual, a su vez, nos permite a nosotros influenciar nuestras relaciones con ambos, los proveedores y los clientes. Unan esa información con tecnología, y ustedes tendrán la infraestructura para revolucionar los modelos......

Words: 1653 - Pages: 7

Apple vs Dell

...I have chosen Apple and Dell, I have owned a Dell for many years and my daughter is an Apple fan. I do own an Apple phone however I have always stuck with what I rely on. Here are a few stats about what each offer. Dell’s products including servers and networking, IT services, storage products. It also offers mobility and desktop PC products, software and peripheral products. - Mobility and desktop PC products: Dell’s Latitude, Vostro, Dell Precision, XPS are lines of mobility notebooks/laptops are designed to customize technology, services, and to suit the specific needs of individuals and businesses. - Servers and Networking: It offers standards-based PowerEdge line of servers including PowerEdge Tower Servers, PowerEdge Rack Servers, and PowerEdge Server. - Peripherals: Dell offers Dell-branded printers and displays and a multitude of third-party peripheral products, such as printers, televisions, notebook accessories, mice, keyboards, networking and wireless products, digital cameras, and other products. - Software: Dell also offer a range of third-party software products, including operating systems, business and office applications, anti-virus and related security software, entertainment software and others . - IT Services: Dell global services business offers a broad range of configurable IT services that help to implement, manage IT operations. - Storage products: Dell offers a portfolio of Dell-branded and third-party advanced storage solutions Apple’s......

Words: 489 - Pages: 2

Ford vs Dell

...Executive Summary FORDs current method of controlling all aspects of the manufacturing is outdated and is limiting the corporation’s annual results. In order to stay competitive and become efficient again, FORD needs to re-evaluate their current supply chain and implement key portions of DELLs vertically integrated supply chain model. A proper implementation will increase information flow between suppliers, departments and dealers resulting in a reduction of redundant inventory and focus towards just in time inventory. All of these factors will further drive up the already US industry leading profit margin per vehicle. In order to accomplish these goals FORD needs to refocus the Purchasing department’s responsibilities, consolidate and develop suppliers that deliver finished high level components and increase the information flow across all points of the supply chain. These steps will help to introduce a more pull-based system.   Contents Issue identification 1 Environmental and root cause analysis 2 Alternatives/Options 3 Recommendations 4 Implementation 5 Monitor & Control 6 Issue identification • Current order to delivery (OTD) is more than 60 days. • Management of large supplier network. • Utilization of IT is lacking. • Purchasing isn’t integrated into Product development. • Independent dealership network has resulted in FORDs loss of control over customer service experiences. This network also breeds FORD vs. FORD sales......

Words: 863 - Pages: 4

Ford vs Dekk

...and external factorshave pushed Ford to search for solutions in order to overcome the costly supply chain challengesthat they are facing and may continue to face in the future. Ford’s major difficulty in their present system is: the inefficient control of their large data base and complex network of suppliers, the existence of independent distributors and their inability to communicate and servetheir customers directly.Realizing an urgent need to modify their supply chain in order to make it more cost effective andmore profitable, and after careful analysis of the whole situation, I have recommended the partialimplementation and execution of the virtual integration direct business model that has been used by Dell. Through this model, Ford will use the emerging information technologies and internet aswell as new ideas from high tech industries in order to interact and transact with their suppliersand end users. Furthermore, Ford can boost its sales by providing better customer service and byhaving faster communication between suppliers, manufacturers, and customers in the valuechain.This proposed system will have to run concurrently with the existing supply chain so that Fordwill cover both market segments at the same time. Since Dell and Ford are two different types of industries, one is in computer manufacturing and the other is in auto industry, it does not seemright for Ford to implement exactly the same "virtual integration model" as Dell. In fact, if Fordimplements the......

Words: 6210 - Pages: 25

Ford vs. General Motors

...12/12/2013 Business Finance Ford Vs. General Motors I have decided to do my comparison project for my Business Finance class over Ford and General Motors Corporation. They are both car companies that are in the market of making compact, mid-sized, luxury, and SUV classes. They are similar in many ways and are also very different in many ways. General Motors was more affected by the recession of 2007 to 2009 and were part of the great bailout, where Ford was more self-supported and took care of itself without having to have any help from the bailout. I am taking information for this report from the years of 2010 to 2012 as the 2013 information is not yet out. I will start with Ford on the issue of stocks and then go into General Motors. I will try to do my best to compare them to one another and point out the highlights of both companies. First off, Ford. Ford had only 9.15% of its liabilities paid out to stockholders in 2012, which was similar to its 2011 percentage of liabilities to stockholders in 2011 with a rating of 9.2%. In 2010, only .41% of its liabilities were stockholders shares of stock. Common stock in the years 2010 to 2012 were all about the same. The balance sheet shows that anywhere from 38,000 to 40,000 were the numbers of owed common stock dividends. There was no information on Preferred Stock or Redeemable Preferred Stock so I am assuming that there were no shares of this stock available over these years for Ford. I would say that......

Words: 1376 - Pages: 6

Toyota vs. Ford

...Ford vs Toyota Ford Motor Company is the second-largest automobile company in the world. Ford's main focus is automobiles; however, they also operate in Ford Credit and Hertz Corporation. Ford also has controlling interest in Mazda Motor Corporation. Ford was established June, 1903; in an old wagon factory in Detroit Michigan. In 1903, Ford began production on a two-cylinder, 8 horsepower called the Model A. They produced a total of 1,708 of these cars in their first year of operation. Toyota Motor Corporation was Japan's largest car company. Toyota ranked the world's third largest by the year 2000. The company could produce near five million car units annually in the 1990s and controlled approximately 10 percent of the global market. Toyota was founded by a man named Kiichiro Toyoda in 1933. He did not produce his first car until 1935. By this time General Motors and Ford were already operating in Japan. Both companies are manufactures of cars which are sold in the United States. One is made in Japan and the other in the United States. They are both a financially well because of the popularity of their cars. The accounting criteria's that they both face are different because of the foreign rules and regulations. Both companies are faced with their own set of rules that have to be followed, but Toyota is faced with more issues since they sell their cars in the United States How does a U.S. company differ from a foreign company? What reporting regulations are different or the...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Ford vs Chevy

...Ford vs Chevrolet Ford and Chevrolet (Chevy) are in the automotive industry and have been in completion for many years start back in 1908, both companies started in the state of Michigan and have been battling it out for profits, market share and hometown bragging rights. Ford was founded in the suburb of Dearborn, Michigan and Chevy was founded in Flint, Michigan. Ford and Chevy both are good-producing sectors, they both manufacture automobiles that are similar but different. They each have a mission statement, Ford’s mission statement “One Team, One Plan, One Goal.” Ford’s mission statement is defined to each part of the statement, One Team meaning people working together as a lean, global enterprise. One Plan meaning aggressively restructure to operate profitably at the current demand and changing model mix, developing new products our customers want and value, finance our plan and improve our balance sheet, and work together as one team. One Goal meaning an exciting viable Ford delivering profitable growth for all. Chevy’s mission statement is an unofficial statement “We win when the customer says we win.” Chevy has an unofficial mission statement but uses more of Five Principles to guide its business, Safety and Quality First, create long-life customers, innovate, deliver long-term investment value and make a positive difference. Both Ford and Chevy are oligopoly competition, being that both companies supplies a large portion of the automotive industry. Being in...

Words: 1311 - Pages: 6

Hitler vs Ford

...German Studies Association Adolf Hitler vs. Henry Ford: The Volkswagen, the Role of America as a Model, and the Failure of a Nazi Consumer Society Author(s): Wolfgang König Source: German Studies Review, Vol. 27, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp. 249-268 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press on behalf of the German Studies Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1433081 . Accessed: 11/11/2013 18:23 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . The Johns Hopkins University Press and German Studies Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to German Studies Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 140.203.12.206 on Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:23:56 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The AdolfHitlervs.HenryFord: Volkswagen, the Role of America as a Model, and the Failureof a Nazi ConsumerSociety WolfgangKinig TechnischeUniversitat Berlin the to Abstract:Modeling consumer States,NaziGermany planned societyoftheUnited witha......

Words: 8203 - Pages: 33

Ford Motor Company/Dell Computer

...partnership relationship with suppliers, no design involvement from suppliers Ford has several thousand suppliers and operates in a more complex network. Well Dell has only about 50 suppliers. Meanwhile Ford needs several thousands of parts to produce a product while Dell needs less than hundred parts. Suppliers were picked primarily based on cost and little regard was given to overall supply chain cost. There are already lots of good component manufacturers out there. Ford should focus the field where it could create value such as introducing the best product in the market and set up partnership via key suppliers instead of developing the components or managing the component suppliers. With the partner relationship and involvement of suppliers in design phases, the key suppliers will feel more secure and will bring new design to Fords, will take initiative to manage JIT inventory, trouble shoot the quality issues on site and etc to ensure Win-Win. This will benefit Ford to reduce inventory, increase return on the asset and reduce the cycle time. Meanwhile Ford could put on more focus to the consumer to be able to forecast the demand accurately. • Supplier lack of up to date IT infrastructure: 1st Tier suppliers had well developed IT capabilities but not able to invest in new technologies at the Rate Ford itself could. And IT maturity decreased rapidly in lower tiers of the supply chain. While Ford need up to date IT infrastructure from suppliers to stay up to speed in......

Words: 1204 - Pages: 5

Dell vs. Hp

...1.Which company is competitively stronger—Dell or Hewlett-Packard? HP is still competitively stronger than Dell today in regards to overall sales. While Dell had been the industry leader in lean manufacturing approaches and cost-efficient build-to-order production methods in producing desktop PCs, it had fallen behind in producing laptop computers. The three elements in Dell’s business strategy included: entering the white-box pc segment, advertising, and continuously reducing costs. While these strategies have brought success to Dell, the Hewlett-Packard Company excelled in the printer market. Dell believed that HP was using its big margins on printer products to subsidize selling its PCs at prices comparable to Dell’s, even though Dell had costs that were about eight percent lower than HPs. Since the computer technology industry is constantly changing, the market leaders shift all the time. Currently Acer Inc. is close to taking over HP’s industry lead. 2.What actions and strategy changes would you recommend to Michael Dell to boost the company’s performance and its prospects for overtaking HP in global sales of PCs? Most of HP’s global market share in PCs and servers came from having the world’s biggest and most diverse network of distribution partners. The percentage of PCs and servers sold by its direct sales force and by its various channel partners varied by geographic region and country. The customer buying patterns and market conditions from these......

Words: 328 - Pages: 2

Apple vs Dell

...Apple vs. Dell A Comparative Analysis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for Elephants and Cheetahs: Systems, Strategy and Bottlenecks Submitted to Prof. Saral Mukherjee Ms. Kavya Sajwan 01-September-2013 Prepared by Anubhav Sinha Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The computer industry is highly competitive and is characterized by large number of competitors and price based competition. Factors like technology, income levels and internet usage are drivers of growth in the industry. In this industry Dell and Apple have followed two distinct strategies to succeed. Dell has Just-in-time manufacturing facilities, direct sales to customers, mass customization and build-to-order manufacturing. It basically operates assembly plants and purchases all the components from partner suppliers and tries to achieve a virtual integration of suppliers, manufacturing and customers. Dell products appeal to customer segments that are looking for affordable, high performance products and are typically large businesses. The manufacturing practices at Dell have helped in cutting costs and delivering latest technology products to the customers. The direct sales strategy has also provided Dell with a feedback mechanism which helps it forecast demand trends much better and reduce the risk. R&D at dell is geared towards process improvements and quality controls. Dell however, cannot bring architectural......

Words: 4446 - Pages: 18

Dell vs. Groove

...I will discuss the similarities and differences between Michael Dell and Andy Grove. Both are CEOs of fortune 500 hundred companies. Michael Dell is the Founder of the Dell Computer Corporation while Andy Grove is a co-founder and former CEO of Intel. The purpose of this paper is to discuss, dissect and explore the business style of these two CEO and the contributions they made to their organizations and the business community. The source of my information will come from the book What the Best CEOs Know, 7 Exceptional Leaders and their Lessons for Transforming any Business. (Kames, 2003) Michael Dell, who at the age of 12, started his entrepreneurship by placing ads for Dell Stamps in the local trade journal. Later while in college, Michal turned his dorm room into a computer making business where he made and sold computers. Remembering a lesson he learned earlier in life; take your product directly to the consumer. Michael used a direct model approach. By eliminating middlemen and intermediaries, Dell created a one on one relationship with the customer and the company which led to a very successful organization. (Kames, 2003, P.59) The Dell Corporation was created in 1984. Formed in the 1968, Andy Grove was co-founder, served as president, chairman and CEO of Intel from 1979 to 1998. Under Grove’s leadership and guidance Intel became the largest computer chipmaker in the world. Considered a legend in his field by many of his peers, he coined the phrase Strategic Inflection...

Words: 777 - Pages: 4

Toyota vs Ford

.../strategic-alignment/strategic-alignment-business-cases/the-rise-of-toyota.aspx Bunkley, N. (2016). Ford won’t blindly chase market share. Automotive News, 90(6708), 0032. Edwards, J. (2012). Mastering Strategic Management ( 1st Canadian Edition ed.). Retrieved 04 01, 2016, from http://opentextbc.ca/strategicmanagement/chapter/types-of-international-strategies/ Funaru, M. (n.d.). Toyota’s business strategies in international markets. Braşov: University of Braşov. Retrieved 04 01, 2016, from http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v3_2010/0038v3-004.pdf Gillis, C. (2015, September 13). What’s it really like in the driver’s seat of a driverless car? Mclean’s. Retrieved from http://www.macleans.ca Henry, J. (2015, August 30). One Ford, Part Two; Tweaking The Master Plan. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com Hitt, M., Ireland, R. & Hoskisson, R. (2015). Strategic management : competitiveness & globalization : concepts & cases. Stamford, Conn: Cengage Learning. Negi, R. (2013, 03 27). Toyota: Analysis of Vision Statement, Corporate Level Strategies & SWOT. Retrieved 04 02, 2016, from Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/rohannegi/toyota-analysis-of-vision-statement-corporate-level-strategies-swot NYSE. (2016). Financials for Ford Motor Company. Retrieved March 28, 2016 from http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AF&fstype=ii&ei=n0f5VrjeEojUigKop5rADg NYSE. (2016). Historical prices for Ford Motor Company. Retrieved March 28, 2016 from......

Words: 671 - Pages: 3

Gm vs Ford

...ratios like ROA (from 0.05 in 2010 to 0.07 in 2011) and ROE (from 0.23 in 2010 to 0.25 in 2011). While the recession significantly affected GM, it also affected the rest of the automobile industry, including their American competitor Ford Motors. We compare the main differences between these two important companies and analyze the way they reacted to the recession. We also observe the approach that Ford has taken to recovery, in terms of governance, recession reactions and financial branches. The report ends with a conclusion summarizing the key differences between General Motors and Ford Motors, and how these differences influenced their financial performance. We can conclude that the way these two companies compete in the same industry is very different and includes distinctive business models and results. The management styles of their CEOs, where Mulally was a risk taker for Ford, GM had CEOs who had a more conservative approach. The growth strategies employed by the firms are fairly similar, although Ford appears to be slightly more aggressive. Historically, Ford has had higher turnover ratios, which partially helped it to have a better cash position than GM during the crisis. Lastly, the two companies implemented different ways to raise funds; Ford, levering its balance sheet to important levels and GM “selling” its debt (GMAC divestiture) and asking for government intervention. Two different approaches that at the end helped the firms continue being in the market. So......

Words: 11121 - Pages: 45