Insubordination

In: Other Topics

Submitted By pamelajones
Words 547
Pages 3
Insubordination
When an employee willfully disobeys a supervisor's lawful orders, this indicates insubordination. Insubordination is also defined as a continuing or constant intentional refusal to obey an implied or direct order that is reasonable in nature and issued by someone in authority.
The grounds for dismissal, Depending on the insubordination's severity and the number of times it's occurred, it may or may not be a dischargeable offense. Often, insubordination may be the result of inexperience or bad judgment that can be remedied with a quick word. When it's chronic and willful, it's a different matter entirely; another cause for dismissal due to insubordination is the refusal to perform a manager's direct order, Verbal abuse, such as the use of profanity and insults may or may not be grounds for dismissal. (The Society for Human Resources Management states that managers should consider the context in which the language was used.)
If an employee physically assaults or intimidates a manager or other superior in the workplace, that is grounds for immediate dismissal, according to Boston.com

Professionalism
Professionalism is defined as one's conduct at work and the level of excellence or competence that is expected of a professional. For instants one can show professionalism by not air one’s personal life all over the work place and not lying about someone or a situation.
It is inevitable that you will occasionally have disagreements with your co-workers or even your boss when such a thing occurs, just calmly explain your opinion and be ready to walk away if the other person can't be swayed or if he or she begins to lose control.
Don't Hide From Your Mistakes; hiding from one’s mistakes will only makes matters worse.
Watch your mouth; cussing all the time for one isn’t professional but also improper and inappropriate especially in the work place.…...

Similar Documents

Soc 120 : Introduction to Ethics and Social Responsibility

...Military Orders 1 To Obey or Not to Obey: Unethical Military Orders Richard Cuoco SOC 120 : Introduction to Ethics and Social Responsibility Instructor : Stacey Hiles February 27th 2012 Military Orders 2 In a military environment following orders is essentially the top priority. Insubordination is generally defined as a willful or intentional failure to obey a lawful and reasonable request of a supervisor.1 Following orders shows that the organization is well structured and disciplined. Sometimes though an order comes down from above that you may feel is not ethical or it goes against your standard thought of what is right or wrong. Here I plan to discuss my thoughts on this topic as well as supporting my claim that through the use of utilitarianism, a solution to this issue could be reached. In the recent past the image of our military has been tarnished in perspective of the public eye as a result of some officers not following ethical conduct of the force. They believe that their thoughts and ideas about what can come from their orders are the only thing that matters and what you feel shouldn’t matter because you are a subordinate and should follow orders. With that said I believe that there should be an ethical process involved when making certain decisions. I also believe that all subordinates should let their superiors know what they think of certain common situations so there is no need to question someone’s ethics when there isn’t time to do so...

Words: 1655 - Pages: 7

Alvarez

...his long years in service. He is known in Canalven as a “Career Man” and energetic and proud of his job. His pride is shown in the yellow inscription bearing his name in the machines he designed. However, he is disliked by many workers because of being full time grumbler. He shows insubordination with his superior, Stone, by ignoring his instructions as in the case of the furnace incident. Moreover, Alvarez is influencing other workers to follow his orders instead of Stone. Stone believed that other workers don’t trust him because Alvarez is demoralizing them and brought the issue to the higher management. This case will be analysed and dealt with the point of view of the Assistant Plant Manager, Pinto, as he will be responsible in the course of action to take on the Alvarez case. Analysis: Stone and Alvarez are having problems from the beginning. Alvarez would not accept Stone’s authority because he believed that Stone do not know anything about machines and are changing “things” that had worked for years. Stone do not like the yellow inscriptions that Alvarez is printing on the equipment as he believed that these are company’s assets. He is also having problem with Alvarez’ insubordination and the other workers lack of trust in him. Listed below are the observed behaviour/ personality and attributes of Stone and Alvarez to better understand each central characters of the case. Stone | Alvarez | Positive: young | Positive: energetic, talented, clever, | ......

Words: 1297 - Pages: 6

Nytimes

...intending to obstruct the war drafts and weaken the soldiers’ loyalty. Schenck was then arrested and charged in Philadelphia, PA, for violating the Sedition Act for: “attempting to cause insubordination in the military and naval forces of the United States” and was convicted. A few days later after he was convicted, he appealed his case to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court agreed to hear his case and his case was tried on January 9th, 1919. During the trial, many questions were brought up. One of which was whether or not the first amendment could be limited during wartime and whether or not if the Sedition Act was constitutional. “I don’t believe that freedoms should be limited at all during wartime.” said Schenck’s lawyers. “There would be no point in the constitution if freedoms are limited.” What follows is an excerpt of an interview with Schenck’s lawyers during a brief intermission. Q. As addressed during the trial, Do you believe your client has endangered the American people by promoting the burning of draft cards? A. No Schenck has not directly told the recipient to burn their draft cards, it is only inferred that he has. Q. Even so, would it not cause insubordination among the people? Would this not affect the safety of our citizens? A. No it would not cause insubordination… It would not affect the safety of our citizens because the pamphlet is harmless and is merely speaking out the opinions of Schenck. Q. Do you believe that during wartime, our rights......

Words: 481 - Pages: 2

(Case Brief Unit 3 Pa205) Mitchell vs. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., 555 P.2d 696 (N.M. 1976)

...Carol was a licensed nurse. From May 24 to June 4 Mrs. Mitchell refused to perform her duties as a relief medications aide”. The actions and behavior demonstrated by Mrs. Mitchell in the above statement are insubordination. “Employee Insubordination” is legally defined as “ willful or intentional failure to obey a lawful and reasonable request of a supervisor. It may also be an action, which constitutes lack of respect or harassment directed toward a supervisor” (Insubordination, 2014). There are three elements that constitute insubordination, one is there was a direct order issued to an employee, two is that the employee received and understood the direct order that was given to him or her, and three the employee refused to obey, or follow the order through an explicit statement of refusal or through nonperformance. In cases of abusive language insubordination may not be found if the supervisor provoked the abusive language, if the abusive language was not spoken in the presents of other employees or customers, or if it was an example shop talk in the workplace “meaning normal excepted talk within the work place” (Insubordination, 2014). Using the legal definition of “insubordination” Mrs. Mitchell committed the act of insubordination, and is guilty of insubordination on May 24 through June 4. Repetitively refusing to do her job, and directly disobeying direct orders from her superiors. Which constitutes “misconduct” according to the newly adopted definition by the State......

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Pa205: Case Briefs - Unit 4

...causing problems at work. Ms. Rodney’s continued disobedient to her the formal reprimand set forth conditions, and her supervisor further constitutes the required elements of insubordination and misconduct. The actions and behavior demonstrated by Ms. Rodman in the above statement are insubordination. “Employee Insubordination” is legally defined as “ willful or intentional failure to obey a lawful and reasonable request of a supervisor. It may also be an action, which constitutes lack of respect or harassment directed toward a supervisor” (Insubordination, 2014). There are three elements that constitute insubordination, one is there was a direct order issued to an employee, two is that the employee received and understood the direct order that was given to him or her, and three the employee refused to obey, or follow the order through an explicit statement of refusal or through nonperformance. In cases of abusive language insubordination may not be found if the supervisor provoked the abusive language, if the abusive language was not spoken in the presents of other employees or customers, or if it was an example shop talk in the workplace “meaning normal excepted talk within the work place” (Insubordination, 2014). Using the legal definition of “insubordination” Ms. Rodman is guilty of insubordination and misconduct because of her repeated disobeying her supervisor’s direct orders and the formal reprimand set forth conditions to prevent further corrective action phone calls...

Words: 3905 - Pages: 16

Week 2 Assignment

...administrator, you can encourage teamwork by modeling good business behavior yourself. That means meeting regularly with your physicians and shareholders to discuss financial performance and opportunities for growth, maintaining open lines of communication, and resolving conflicts as quickly and professionally as possible. 4. What is the meaning for insubordination and why it is grounds for dismissal? Insubordination is considered one of the deadly sins, right up there with theft and violence. Unwillingness to carry out a directive from a manager or supervisor can manifest itself as a verbal refusal, a nonverbal refusal or an unreasonable delay in completing work. Disrespectful behavior toward a manager or supervisor can include cursing at a supervisor, verbally or physically intimidating a manager or supervisor, or speaking loudly or argumentatively to or about a supervisor. Employers that face insubordination in the workplace usually handle the situation using their normal disciplinary procedures. While insubordination can be addressed using verbal warnings, written warnings and suspensions, extreme examples of insubordination may warrant immediate dismissal....

Words: 392 - Pages: 2

Documents.Docx

...Sample Written Warning Letter for Insubordination June 1, 2011 Dear Mr. John E. Adams: World English Dictionary: not submissive to authority; disobedient or rebellious This written warning is being issued to you for violating our company policy on insubordination as stated in our company employee handbook. Specifically, on May 27, 2011, at approximately 9:35 am you refused to take direction from your supervisor when they directed you to shut down the conveyor belt you were working on and move to the loading dock to help with unloading a delivery. Although you finally did follow their direction it wasn't until they made three separate requests to do so. Mr. Adams, it is important that you follow your supervisors direction at all times. The only exception to this would be if you were directed to perform a task that was unethical, illegal, or unsafe. In the future if you fail to follow any company policy you will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including possible termination. Sincerely, Robert R. Smith Supervisor John E. Adams Employee My signature does not necessarily indicate that I am in agreement with the above statements; however, it does indicate that I was informed of the contents of this letter. Sample Employee Conduct Policy Every individual is expected to execute their assigned duties as directed during on duty time. Insuring quality in everything we do requires attention to detail and working quickly or carelessly......

Words: 476 - Pages: 2

Pa 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation

...of preventing further corrective action. Issue: Did Ms. Rodman’s behavior and volume of calls constitute as misconduct and violate hospital personnel policies? Were these actions enough to deny unemployment compensation benefits? Rule: The state of New Mexico concludes that any employee who has been discharged for misconduct shall be ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits under § 51–1–7(B). Additionally, the definition of misconduct has been adopted from Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., 89 N.M. 575, 577, 555 P.2d 696, 698 (1976). Analysis: The District Court concludes that Ms. Rodman’s actions on February 15 were shown to display a willful disregard for her employer’s interest, repeated insubordination, and failure to comply with employer’s wishes regarding personal phone calls and visitors. To Read More or Download Complete Tutorial Click on Purchase Button and Complete Your Transaction PA 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation http://homeworklance.com/downloads/pa-205-unite-4-assignment-case-citation/ To Get this Tutorial Copy & Paste above URL Into Your Browser Hit Us Email for Any Inquiry at: Lancehomework@gmail.com Visit our Site for More Tutorials: ( http://homeworklance.com/ ) PA 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation Case Citation: 764 P.2d 1316, 107 N.M. 758 Facts: Rodman, a unit secretary for Presbyterian Hospital for the previous eight years, was terminated on February 17, 1987 for violating......

Words: 1290 - Pages: 6

Pa 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation

...of preventing further corrective action. Issue: Did Ms. Rodman’s behavior and volume of calls constitute as misconduct and violate hospital personnel policies? Were these actions enough to deny unemployment compensation benefits? Rule: The state of New Mexico concludes that any employee who has been discharged for misconduct shall be ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits under § 51–1–7(B). Additionally, the definition of misconduct has been adopted from Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., 89 N.M. 575, 577, 555 P.2d 696, 698 (1976). Analysis: The District Court concludes that Ms. Rodman’s actions on February 15 were shown to display a willful disregard for her employer’s interest, repeated insubordination, and failure to comply with employer’s wishes regarding personal phone calls and visitors. To Read More or Download Complete Tutorial Click on Purchase Button and Complete Your Transaction PA 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation http://homeworklance.com/downloads/pa-205-unite-4-assignment-case-citation/ To Get this Tutorial Copy & Paste above URL Into Your Browser Hit Us Email for Any Inquiry at: Lancehomework@gmail.com Visit our Site for More Tutorials: ( http://homeworklance.com/ ) PA 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation Case Citation: 764 P.2d 1316, 107 N.M. 758 Facts: Rodman, a unit secretary for Presbyterian Hospital for the previous eight years, was terminated on February 17, 1987 for violating......

Words: 2580 - Pages: 11

Pa 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation

...of preventing further corrective action. Issue: Did Ms. Rodman’s behavior and volume of calls constitute as misconduct and violate hospital personnel policies? Were these actions enough to deny unemployment compensation benefits? Rule: The state of New Mexico concludes that any employee who has been discharged for misconduct shall be ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits under § 51–1–7(B). Additionally, the definition of misconduct has been adopted from Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., 89 N.M. 575, 577, 555 P.2d 696, 698 (1976). Analysis: The District Court concludes that Ms. Rodman’s actions on February 15 were shown to display a willful disregard for her employer’s interest, repeated insubordination, and failure to comply with employer’s wishes regarding personal phone calls and visitors. To Read More or Download Complete Tutorial Click on Purchase Button and Complete Your Transaction PA 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation http://homeworklance.com/downloads/pa-205-unite-4-assignment-case-citation/ To Get this Tutorial Copy & Paste above URL Into Your Browser Hit Us Email for Any Inquiry at: Lancehomework@gmail.com Visit our Site for More Tutorials: ( http://homeworklance.com/ ) PA 205 Unite 4 Assignment Case Citation Case Citation: 764 P.2d 1316, 107 N.M. 758 Facts: Rodman, a unit secretary for Presbyterian Hospital for the previous eight years, was terminated on February 17, 1987 for violating......

Words: 3096 - Pages: 13

Ethical Decision Paper

...Scenario 1 1. A medical imaging professional, whom coworkers and the supervisor suspect of having an alcohol problem, appears at work with an alcohol smell on his breath, compromised gait, and slightly slurred speech. The supervisor pulls him aside, specifically identifies the signs he has outwardly observed, reminds the employee that, according to the substance abuse policy, this is grounds for drug testing, and requests that the employee undergo a blood test. The employee refuses to cooperate with his request. Is this insubordination, or would the testing be a violation of the professional’s rights? This is insubordination and the testing is not a violation of his professional rights. An employee that comes into work in this state is disruptive and could be a direct threat to his patients as well as his coworkers. According to the EEOC, “an employer may require that an individual not pose a direct threat of harm to his or her own safety or health, as well as to the health or safety of others. However, such determinations must be strictly based on valid medical analyses or other objective evidence related to this individual, using the factors set out above. A determination that a person might cause harm to himself or herself cannot be based on stereotypes." (3) This situation is and ethical dilemma. Also, there could be a high potential for error resulting in this employee being in his non-professional state. His supervisor did pulled him aside and......

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Professionalism

...makes a person feels good about him or herself as well. 3. Identify specific ways teamwork can be promoted in the physician's office. Team work in a physician’s office can be promoted by going a job even if it is not your job to do so. Doing that tells your physician and co-workers that you are dependable when needed and that you don’t want to risk your employment by being insubordinate. Another way team work can be promoted in the office is by putting your personal feeling to the side while at work; at work you are there to do your job and care for the patients in any way possible because they are the reason the office even exist. 4. Discuss the meaning of insubordination and why it is grounds for dismissal. Insubordination according to out textbook is defined as disobedience to authority. Insubordination is grounds for dismissal because it shows that a person has no respect for the person in charge of them and respect plays a huge part not only in a physician’s office but in life. Refusing to do something in the atmosphere of medical office might put a patient life at risk all because an employee felt like it wasn’t his or her job to do what was needed at the time....

Words: 389 - Pages: 2

Employment at Will

...decision between Bill and the company could be best describe as Free Market Ethics, in which the goal of the business is to be profitable. By Bill assuming part of the expense, this will go towards the goal are being profitable. Now, the next example is scenario number five; one of the department supervisors requests your approval to fire his secretary for insubordination. Under the At-Will doctrine, the termination of the secretary for insubordination due to refusing to prepare false reports would be protected. Forcing the secretary to violate state law, or public policy is one of the exceptions to the terms of at-will employment. Public policy exception is defined as the “actions that violate a public interest.” Providing false documentation would clearly hinder the company, management and investors from making sound financial decisions based off of the expense reports. If the company were to terminate the secretary, the company could be held liable under the Public policy exclusion. Let’s assume the company did terminate the secretary for insubordination; let’s also assume that Public Policy was not addressed in the insubordination section under the at-will terms; could the secretary have any options other than public policy? The answer would be yes. Due to the termination of the secretary under these probable causes, the secretary would be protected under the policy also under the Whistleblowing policy. The Whistleblowing policy was “passed in the wake of financial and......

Words: 1826 - Pages: 8

Memo

...Boyce, Chief Executive Officer From: Student, Personnel Management Consultant Subject: Karen Carlin Case Study: Issue Analysis and Proposed Solutions Date: 21 October 2010 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memo is to analyze and propose solutions for the issues Karen Carlin faces as she takes on the supervisor role for the schedule typist department of Hepplewhite & Boyce. The three issues to be analyzed are (1) lack of productivity, (2) insubordination and abuse of company resources, and (3) staff mismanagement. First, the problems will be defined and probable causes discussed. Then, recommendations will be made to resolve these issues. DEFINITION OF PROBLEMS AND PROBABLE CAUSES The problems identified in this memo are ones Hepplewhite & Boyce can easily resolve with a few simple actions. Doing so will not only be good for the company but will be good for the employees as well. The end goals should be as follows: (1)Increased productivity within the schedule typist department. (2)An end to the insubordination and abuse of company resources. (3)Improved management of the schedule typist staff. The issues within the department will be explained in further detail next. Lack of productivity The first issue within the schedule typist department of Hepplewhite & Boyce is a lack of productivity on the part of two of the employees, Pat and Pauline. In order to do the least amount of work possible, Pat and Pauline are purposely not updating the tax......

Words: 1255 - Pages: 6

Assignment

...your vision into your future reality. Setting goals also helps a person achieve career success because once you set your short term goals and long term goals then start breaking them down it will help you get where you want to go. 3. Identify specific ways teamwork can be promoted in the phycian's office. · One of the best tenets for promoting teamwork is that there has to be an increased interaction amoungst employees or team members. This helps tem in learning to understand each other and deal with the different aspects of their behavior, both negative and positive within the context of the organizational tasks. 4. Discuss the meaning of insubordination and why it is ground for dismissal. · Insubordination is difined as disobedience to authority. Depending on the insubordinations severity and the number of times it's occurred it may or may not be a discharegeable offense. This often may be the result of inexperience or bad judgement that can be remedied with a quick word. When it's chronic and willful it's adifferent matter entirely and termination can be pushed forth....

Words: 255 - Pages: 2