P&G Market Analysis

In: Business and Management

Submitted By mahevash
Words 610
Pages 3
PROCTOR AND GAMBLE COMPANY
DECISION SHEET
The LDL market segmentation for Procter & Gamble is based on three main product attributes. Performance describes the product’s primary cleaning benefit, mildness describes the gentleness on hands, and price provides the benefit of low cost. P&G positioned its three LDL brands very differently. Ivory is positioned to appeal to females, primarily middle-class mothers, who enjoy the benefit of younger looking hands. Advertisements depict a mother/daughter comparison to illustrate this youthful appeal. Its creamy-white color and light scent relates this LDL to the Ivory bar soap, which consumers recognize for its mildness. Dawn is positioned purely as a performance LDL for those who seek superior grease-cutting abilities. By allocating most of the marketing budget towards coupons, this brand seeks early-adoption by new customers in hopes of promoting brand loyalty among households. Joy is the original LDL manufactured by P&G, and is positioned as a reliable and recognizable option due to its unique yellow color and fresh lemon scent.
Procter & Gamble should implement product improvements on an existing brand. As a successful, established performance brand primarily recognized for its grease-cutting abilities, Dawn is the preferred brand for performance improvements. The improvement of an existing brand will require roughly $20 million in capital costs, similar to those required to introduce a new brand. However, while a new brand would need more than $60 million in marketing expenditures, a product improvement needs only $10 million. Additionally, a new brand introduction would require two years, plus another year in a test market, while a product improvement requires at most two years. Though this is longer than the time required to gain approval for increased marketing expenditures, it will likely…...

Similar Documents

P&G Case

...companies worldwide. In 1987, they had US$17 billion in revenues and US$786 million net earnings. Commitment to develop and market products that can satisfy consumer needs is said to be the critical factor to their success. Subsidiary operations of Australia, New Zealand, India, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia are all managed by P&G’s Asia-Pacific Regional Headquarters in Hongkong. P&G-Asia’s major brands include Pampers, Always, Head and Shoulders, Rejoice, Oil of Ulan, Clearasil, Camay, Zest and Vicks. One of the P&G subsidiaries in Asia is in Singapore. P&G-Singapore which has 70 staff is headed by a managing director which is also responsible for Malaysian operations. Feminine pads/napkins are one of the products that are being produced by P&G. Always, a brand of feminine pad that was introduced in three lead markets (i.e. U.S., Saudi Arabia & Singapore) in 1983 was an initial success. When introduced in Japan, P&G was blocked from using Always because of trademark reasons. Because of this, the name Whisper was used instead and luckily it was successful. In 1988, competition in the feminine pad market is composed of three major competitors: Kimberly Clark’s Kotex (35% market share) , P&G’s Always (25%) and Kau Laurier (20%). Eight other brands competed for the remaining market share. P&G was the largest market spender in 1989 where it outspent Kotex and Kao five and four times respectively. They spent two thirds of......

Words: 1418 - Pages: 6

G-Shock Market Analysis

...reputable brand of watches, G-Shock has successfully penetrated in Singapore market. Presently, G-Shock Protection series have quickly penetrated due to the brand, the style and the benefit that it has attributes such as shock resistance, water resistance (). Moreover, world time, solar power and other features are actually loaded into a G-Shock Protection (). A box bag and the gift wrapping are such extra services that consumers can get when purchasing the product. ‘’Consumer market is the target market of G-Shock Protection that is a group those who has similar request’’ (). The attributes and the sport-styles of G-Shock Protection are being interested by middle-aged consumers as the group that has similar request. Based on the demand of this group, G-Shock Protection provides many makes and models that come in various styles and colors. Therefore, G-Shock Protection is more likely to be a consumer product. In Singapore, many consumers enquire about various brands of watches from the internet, other consumers or shops. This is point out that consumers usually spend a long time looking on the stylish of the product, including the G-Shock Protection products. Besides, many consumers are willing to accept a substitute product which its style and quality are similar to the G-Shock Protection product that they cannot find, because there are many G-Shock Protection’s competitors. G-Shock Protection has experiences of more than twenty years in Singapore’s market and brings......

Words: 1792 - Pages: 8

P&G Case Study

...Summary Statement/Abstract P&G is a global company that is involved in many different markets including beauty and grooming and household care. The company has been through a lot of change due to the O2005 project that was undertaken in 1999 and saw a complete overhaul of the company during those years. One product that also was involved a lot during that time was the SK-II skin care product which was popular in Japan and a man named de Cesare wanted to take the product global to either the Chinese or European market. However, in order to do this there was a lot of analysis and research which had to be done to determine which market was the best to move the product to and de Cesare had to make a recommendation to the GLT knowing that he must do everything possible to make sure he made the best decision possible. As Paolo DeCesare, what factors do you need to consider before deciding what to recommend in your SK-II presentation to the global leadership team (GLT)? What kind of analysis will you need to do in preparing for that meeting? As Paolo DeCesare there are a lot of factors to consider before deciding what to recommend in the SK-II presentation to the GLT. The biggest factor of course to consider is the profitability of the market or markets that would be chosen to enter in an effort to have SK-II become a global brand within P&G. In order to determine this there is a lot of analysis that goes into determining whether a market will be profitable and could......

Words: 2406 - Pages: 10

P&G Case

...P&G Case Executive Summary This case study analysis is on the Proctor & Gamble Company (also referred to as “P&G”). Procter & Gamble is the world's largest producer of household and personal products by revenue, with its products reaching 4 billion people worldwide. The Case Study includes an Introduction, Company Overview, Company Mandate, Internal Analysis, and External Analysis, followed by various Strategic Options (see below). The author then makes a Final Strategy Option Recommendation. Strategic Option #1: Market to Lower-Income Consumers in both Developed and Emerging Markets (Expand and Build Beauty Segment strictly aimed at Low-Income Consumers). Industry Consolidator. Strategic Option #2: Given the maturity of the North American/Western European market, combined with the emerging popularity and demand for Natural/Organic ingredient products, P&G should look to create New Natural Products and Products tailored to the Male market - Multiple Segments, not just Skin Care (Expand and Build Beauty Segment). Industry Consolidator. Strategic Option #3: Related Diversification through Acquisition. Strategic Option #4: Joint Ventures in Emerging Markets such as China and India. Final Strategy Recommendation: The Recommendation is to go for a combined Low-Income segment and New Natural Product strategy as this facilitates P&G’s need to capture a greater slice of the Low-Income consumer market both in Mature and Developing markets, which also capturing a......

Words: 3683 - Pages: 15

P&G- Scope Case Analysis

...recruiting program. However, CUTCO believes growth drivers will change overtime. Therefore, it was time to adopt a new growth driver if the revenue goals of $500 million and $1 billion were to be met. There are five current driver options: • Investment in recruiting approaches and recruiting structures • Investment in expanding CUTCO brand recognition/preference • Expansion into international markets • Supplemental sales channel • Full entry into the retail sales channel 5. What growth drivers should serve as a strategic focus? Why? Of the options available, it seems investing in recruitment approaches and brand recognition is may be the “safe way out”. The two options are already revenue generating and by investing more efforts, CUTCO may increase their revenue. However, this strategic focus may also gradually slow and level off in the near future. Therefore, it is most profitable to take on new initiatives. CUTCO believes given the present global economy, there is a huge potential in international markets. Although it requires substantial financial resource, the Asian market has not been tested and may have a very high return. The strategic option that stands out the most is the full entry into the retail sales channel. Although this option steers CUTCO away from their marketing practices, the risk to the company is minimal but the potential increase in revenue may be threefold. In 2006 when the CUTCO retail store was launched in Erie, Pennsylvania, the......

Words: 1110 - Pages: 5

P&G- Scope Case Analysis

...1987 and 1990, worldwide sales for P&G had increased by $8 billion and net earnings by $1.3 billion. This success was due to variety of factors, including the ability to develop truly innovative products to meet consumers’ needs. Of the many products introduced throughout the 3 years, Scope, mouthwash, held 34% of the Canadian mouthwash market. Although there was success, there had been concerns with competition and the major changes happening in the mouthwash market. Up until 1988, most mouthwash was marketed primarily on a “bad-breath” strategy. However, Listerine introduced a plaque and inflamed gums preventing mouthwash. New flavors were introduced by a number of brands and it greatly expanded the market in 1987. In 1988 Colgate launched a mouthwash that included fluoride to fight cavities with a mild taste that encouraged children to rinse longer and more often. Finally, Pfizer launched a “prebrushing” rinse called Plax. Although P&G’s Scope held over 30% of the market share in 1990, they recognized that the industry was changing. The market was indefinitely moving towards healthier alternative. 2. Scope’s performance during the past three years can be considered extremely successful. Although it is marginal, in 1988, Scope’s market share was 33% but by 1990 the percentage fell to 32.3%. During the slim decline, Plax’s market share jumped from 1% to 10% in two years. Therefore, the sudden growth in Plax’s sales should be a concern for P&G’s Scope. 3. There are......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

P&G Corparate

...Statement (Actual) 4 Mission Statement (Proposed) 4 Vision Statement (Proposed) 5 Slogan (Proposed) 5 The CPM Matrix of P&G Company 6 External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix for Procter and Gamble (P&G) 9 The I/E matrix for Procter and Gamble (P&G) 14 Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix for Procter and Gamble (P&G) 16 A SWOT Matrix of P&G Company 21 Strengths 23 Weaknesses 23 Opportunities 24 Threats 24 The FOUR strategies 25 The SPACE Matrix 26 Calculation 27 The SPACE Matrix chart 28 The BCG Matrix 29 The BCG Matrix chart 29 The Recommended Long-Term Planning 30 Income Statement and Balance Sheet for Procter and Gamble (P&G) 32 The Recommended Annual Objectives & Policies 35 The Recommended procedures for strategy review and evaluations 35 References: 37 Case Abstraction The Procter & Gamble Co., also known as P&G, is based in the United State of America. Mr. William Procter and Mr. James Gamble are the founders of the company in 1837, and this tell the story behind the company’s name. The P&G company is born when Mr. William, a candle maker from England and Mr. James, a soup maker from Ireland in Ohio. They are met eventually when they married sisters. The company is headquartered in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio, United States. Mr. Bob McDonald is the current CEO of P&G Company. He has a philosophy of focusing on lower-end products. Whereas, Mr. A.G. Lafley, who focus more on the......

Words: 10320 - Pages: 42

P and G Swot

...S. W. O. T. Analysis :( P & G) Strengths • The large scale, on which the P & G operates, is one of its strengths. It is a global leader for different product categories like fabric, home, baby, beauty, health and personal care in many countries. Its three hundred products are sold in over one hundred and eighty countries. • The strong branding of P & G makes it one of the most successful brands in the world. • The company has a vast experience in oral and personal hygiene products as they are working since…. • Also, it has an extensive experience in marketing in different market segments and is one of the best marketers in the world. • P & G is tightly integrated with some of the largest retailers in United States of America as well as world around. and around the world Distribution channels all over the world • Gross profit margin of the company is 15 times the industry average • P & G is known for its diverse brand portfolio. The company is able to customize its global products and brands according to the local preferences. • P & G invests greatly in its research and development to. About $2 billion are invested every year by P & G for improving and introducing new products. The end-consumer understanding of P & G and its large database of consumers make its research and development strong. Weaknesses • Many of the top brands of P & G are losing their market share rapidly. In online media leadership and presence P & G is lagging behind. • The beauty and health......

Words: 588 - Pages: 3

P&G Swot and Tows Analysis

...accounts for approximately 34% of P&G’s product portfolio. 24% of Net Sales & Net Earnings –  Head & Shoulders, Olay, and Pantene are some of the biggest brands within this segment. Strength – Hair Care l  Strong focus on research&developement - promote innovation and bring new products to the Highly recognizable brand-building - shape brand-inspired, benifit-driven brands. market quicker l  l  Great product availability - products are sold at practically all domestic retailer chain and drug stores. l  Large scale production. Weakness- Hair Care l  l  l  l  Losing market share rapidly Women oriented products Limited diversity products (Women oriented products ) Limited functions (less choices for customers) Opportunities- Hair Care Hair and Beauty products for men l  Online social networks and internet marketing techniques l  Try to pursue growth overseas l  Expand brands for hair care products( cut off some other less profitable brands in the beauty segment. - objective is to invest 20 most profitable innovations l  Threats- Hair Care l  Greatest threat to P&G’s Beauty Segment is the Threat of Rivalry –  Unilever, L’Oreal l  l  Mature Market Competitors have more diversified products optional l  boost volume sales growth Price increases help to drive sales revenue but hit volume - needs to increase coverage in the economy price range to TOWS Analysis S- Strengths   • Strong......

Words: 407 - Pages: 2

P&G Strategy

...review to analysis the impact of diversification on Procter & Gamble in different time period. The analyses of Procter & Gamble will be carried out in 3 perspectives: the operation of business, the performance of business and the brand of business. Literature Review & analyses of organization Diversification can be defined as a strategy used to increase the range of products or markets of organization. (Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, 2008) There is a range of reasons result the diversification of organization such as spreading the business risk and increasing the business expectation of stakeholder. (Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, 2008) But the result of research from Aisjah and Subroto (2011) indicated that there are two main reasons boost the diversification of business: firstly, diversification expands the economics of scope of the organization; secondly, diversified business helps organization develop the market power. Similarly, Kotler & Armstrong (2008) also claimed that the diversification enable organization acquire business not only from current products and markets but also from outside. Moreover, diversification also assists organization to allocate tangible resource more efficiently. (Helfat and Eisenhardt, 2004) This essay will focus on the business running of Procter & Gamble in Singapore from 2005 to 2012. In 2005, P&G announced an acquisition of Gillette Company. (P&G annual report, 2005) After the acquisition,......

Words: 1302 - Pages: 6

P&G: Sk-Ii

...CASE STUDY ANALYSIS OF P&G: SK-II GLOBALIZATION PROJECT FOR: Professor Howard Kupferman Written by: Andres Torres Procter and Gamble Case Study Analysis Actors: 1. Alan Lafley: Head of P&G Beauty Care GBU 2. Paolo de Cesare: President of Max Factor Japan 3. Durk Jager: P&G CEO 4. GLT: Global Leadership Team (made up of business GM’s of crucial MDO’s, people from R&D, consumer research, product supply, HR, and finance). Chaired by Lafley. INTRO: In this case study we are introduced to P&G as an organization and their changes in structure overtime. More specifically, after the acquisition of Max Factor Japan and success in its SK-II line, questions are raised about whether global expansion is feasible and profitable as a franchise. De Cesare ran this skin-care line in Japan, but he reported directly to Lafley. This is crucial because global expansion would require Lafley’s approval in budgeting and organizational support. P&G recently went through major organizational changes over a period of six years known as O2005. This created huge questions in the strategy that would be put together in the case of a global expansion for SK-II. Within the U.S. Procter & Gamble originally followed an organizational structure consisting of seven different divisions that were furthermore shattered into 26 distinct categories. Each category had its own R&D, supply management and marketing. In addition, the international......

Words: 2346 - Pages: 10

P&G Analysis

...functional value. 1.2 The sales people concerned that if they launched a product without enough difference from other products, retailers would replacing units within the existing line. The sale of Scope may decline, or P&G may pay 50000 per stock-keeping unit in listing fees to add the new brand. Either way was costly. 1.3 The Market Research people concerned that Adding reassurances to a product often takes time before consumer accepts the idea. 1.4 The Market Research people concerned that if they launched new products, the new one might cannibalize a large amount of Scope’s sales.(Like warner-lambert, they launched listermint but listermint’s market share "primarily at the expense of listerine and smaller brands") 1.5 The Finance people concerned that launching a line extension would cost a large amount of money. 1.6 The Purchasing people concerned that when P&G launched new product the price of ingredients would increased by 50% and the packaging costs would increase by 0.3 USD per unit. 2 High risk 2.1 The PDD people though it was not easy to replicate Plax’s clinical results with P&G’s stringent test methodology. 2.2 Market Research people concerned that the launch of new product might not increase competitive users’ desire to purchase Scope. 2.3 If P&g launched new product, other companies would also do the same thing.(Game Theory)...

Words: 296 - Pages: 2

P&G Company Evaluation

...Industry Valuation Analysis The Procter & Gamble Company and Unilever Group 5 Date: 03/18/2016 Project #: FINC 5300-WINTER 2016 Prepared for: Joan Miao Prepared by: Zhang, Leizi; Zhang, Lingfei; Zhu, Senglin; Zhang, Suyuan Date: 03/18/2016 Project #: FINC 5300-WINTER 2016 Prepared for: Joan Miao Prepared by: Zhang, Leizi; Zhang, Lingfei; Zhu, Senglin; Zhang, Suyuan STRATEGY ANALYSIS Macroeconomic Environment Overview U.S. growth has been recovering since the end of 2014, powered by private consumption. The labor market has been improving as well. The Eurozone is recovering on the heels of increases in private consumption and exports and growth is continuing to expand mildly. Growth in the emerging markets has been decelerating relative to the past in view of China’s structural slowdown, declining commodity prices, a downturn in foreign investment and the need to base growth on domestic demand. The developed countries’ monetary policies are likely to change direction gradually. In our judgment, the Fed will begin liftoff at a moderate pace, bringing its rate to about 1.0% by the end of 2016. Eurozone interest is unlikely to change in 2015 and 2016. Roughly Two thirds of The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G)’s revenue is from outside the United States. In fiscal 2015, net sales of all five-business segments were negatively affected by foreign currency fluctuations due to strong dollar, boosted by recovery of U.S. economy (See......

Words: 4062 - Pages: 17

The Analysis of P&G International Marketing Strategy in Sweden

... 1.1 Procter and Gamble (P&G), as a whole 1 1.2 Procter & Gambles Sverige AB 1 2.0 Marketing Campaign 2 2.1 Overview 2 2.2 Campaign Impact 3 3.0 Marketing Strategy 3 3.1 Analysis of Advertisement in Sweden 3 3.1.1 Root Cause Analysis (RCA) 4 3.1.2 Proposed Solutions and Possible Outcomes 4 3.2 Barriers of Communication 4 4.0 SWOT Analysis of P&G Sverige AB 6 4.1Strength 6 4.2 Weakness 6 4.3 Opportunity 6 4.4 Threats 6 4.5 SWOT Matrix Analysis 7 5.0 Marketing mix analysis 7 5.1 Product analysis 7 5.2 Price Analysis 8 5.3 Place/Distribution Analysis 9 5.4 Promotion Analysis 9 6.0 Conclusion 9 7.0 Appendices 10 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Procter and Gamble (P&G), as a whole The Procter & Gamble Company (also known as P&G) initiated a partnership agreement between William Procter and James Gamble, at the year of 1837. The small business was initially a soap and candle shop, but now an American Multinational Company (MNC) for Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG). P&G who has never neglected the importance of human capital and being passionately develop talents that show great curiosity, appreciation towards diversity, and flexibility in tackling tricky problems. With that, P&G has been rated as the Top 7 in the World’s Top Employers for New Grads at the year of 2014 (refer Figure 1). Comparing between Procter and Gamble (P&G), Colgate-Palmolive (CL), and Unilever, P&G is ranked the second most...

Words: 3138 - Pages: 13

P&G Scope - Case Analysis

...Scope The problem for Procter & Gamble`s (P&G) “Scope” brand is that their share at mouthwash market is slightly going down while a new brand called “Plax” launched by Pfizer Inc. has gained a %10 market share in a very short time period which created a situation that left “P&G”s management team in dilemma for how to respond. P&G has some constraints to solve the problem (in fact, the situation is so complex that for some, no problem and threat exist). First of all, if they introduce a new product in the mouthwash market as a competitor against Plax; they are not sure if it will be really innovative or it will focus on unmet consumer needs. Another limitation is that introducing a new product to the market will cost a lot (even the test production costs $20,000. Capital costs, marketing costs, delivery costs, inventory costs, ingredients costs, packaging costs are other important costs which create concerns) and also will require an effective strategic management. After that, the new product is very similar to Plax and has no significant advantage except a better taste; on the other hand, sales department thinks that for success, the product must be seen as unique. So, P&G can not be sure about the future success of this product. Next, for the new product to gain reassurance, patience is needed. This can only be achieved in the long period. Following this, the new product will also reduce the sales of Scope. Additionally, P&G is not sure about the name of the product......

Words: 646 - Pages: 3