Should Laws Reflect Indirect Harm?

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By verain10
Words 1308
Pages 6
Verain Vasudeva
March 30, 2014
Professor Mark Reitsma

Should Laws Reflect Indirect Harm?

Laws reflect the moral code of the majority within a society. Therefore, the majority within a society depict if a law should be reflective of an indirect harm. Indirect harm is “an action which itself did not harm, but may promote or eventually lead to harm”(Reitsma, Liberty and its Limits: Extent of Freedom), it may have no correlation to leading towards harm. John E. Mills indicated “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (Heydt), but lawmakers perceive it justifiable to create laws that are reflective of indirect harm. Laws against Prostitution and drug’s are reflective of indirect harm. If ones using drugs or is a prostitute is not directly harming others in society. Even though laws that reflect indirect harm are to prevent harm from happing, indirect harm should not be considered whilst making laws because they tend to restrict one's freedoms & liberties and there is no substantial evidence that indirect harm leads to harm.

Laws tend to create restrictions upon individuals of the society. People are overwhelmed by the pressures of these restrictions and cannot express their freedoms & liberates. Firstly, if one is a distinguish as a criminal under indirect harm laws they will be condemned by society when they have not harmed any individual in society, in fact they have or are only wanting to do what they should able to do freely. Being considered a criminal, ones freedoms are limited to what people’s perception of them is, rather it be good or bad, they have to live according to societies demands. Secondly, these laws are in direct violation of one’s rights, as these individuals have not violated other individuals one rights as per…...

Similar Documents

Should We Go Beyond the Law

...of Alternatives The company can stick to the initial plan which is to throw their waste into the river in order to survive in their financial crisis. The company can still pursue the number one alternative and at the same time they should develop a product later on which will be an alternative of not throwing their waste into the river and later on do a campaign on how they can revive the river. Since the cause of its pollution came from the company. . 5. Selection of Desired Alternative The company can go to the second alternative, since a lot of employees will lose their jobs if the company will not survive as a short-term solution they can pursue the idea of throwing the company waste into the river. Of course, the action of the company is not good per se but we need to give importance as well to the big number of employees that will be lay-off in case the company will not survive. Once the company was able to get back on track with their first move, the company should do the next move which is to develop a product which will be an alternative of not throwing the company’s waste into the river. Lastly the company should revive the river; the company can do a campaign where all the employees will be participating in helping the river get back on its original beauty since it is company’s obligation to clean their waste into river. 6. IMPLEMENTATION ......

Words: 519 - Pages: 3

Gun Control Laws Should Not Be Strengthened

...Gun control laws should not be strengthened, instead they should be enforced. Instead of making it harder for law-abiding citizens to obtain guns, guns should be taken away from unstable individuals or people who should not have guns like criminals. The first reason why gun control should not be strengthened is that citizens have the right to own guns; it is one of those entitlements that makes the United States different from other countries. Secondly, criminals are criminals and that is why they are called criminals, they don’t follow the law; basically if a criminal wants a gun they will get a gun, legally or not. My third reason is that guns are used for protection. Strengthening gun control laws will not prevent violence, guns aren’t the only tool used to hurt people, and people will use other objects to hurt people if they can’t have guns. Without a gun, murderers will still murder people whether they use a gun, knife, baseball bat, or any other object, it doesn’t matter. If not that many citizens have guns thanks to stronger gun laws, what if the government becomes tyrannical or does not protect the citizens’ rights? Well they won’t be able to do anything because they will be helpless, they can’t take out the leaders and fix the government. The second amendment states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Adolf Hitler took away guns from the Jewish people......

Words: 1117 - Pages: 5

Law Question to claim the loss from Pecut Laju Sdn Bhd? Law According to the S.74 damages which is the cash compensation by a court or another’s fault or negligence in suffering, the rules for damages can and frequently do vary based on the type of claim which is presented. There are many types of damages. Special damages are those which actually were caused by the injury and include medical and hospital bills, ambulance charges, loss of wages, property repair or replacement costs, or loss of money due on a contract. There are presumed to be a result of the other party's actions is general damages, but are subjective both in nature and determination of value of damages. These damages include distress, future problems of our life and crippling effect of an injury, loss of ability to perform various acts, shortening of life span, mental anguish, loss of companionship, loss of reputation, humiliation from scars, loss of anticipated business and other harm. The third damage is exemplary damages which combines punishment and the setting of public example. Punitive damages may be awarded when the defendant acted in a malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless way in causing the special and general damages to the plaintiff. On occasion punitive damages can be greater than the actual damages. Although the innocent asked for compensation, they are seldom awarded. Nominal damages are those given when the actual harm is minor and an award is warranted under......

Words: 2054 - Pages: 9

Do No Harm

...Ethics: Do No Harm 1 Ethics: Do No Harm Linda Jones Walden University Ethics: Do No Harm 2 Ethical Research involves maintaining honesty in conducting and reporting scientific research, giving appropriate credit for ideas and effort, and considering how knowledge gained through research should be used (Stangor, 2001). There are four basic goals in ethical research and they are providing freedom of choice about participating in the research, protecting participants from physical and psychological harm, maintaining awareness of the power differentials between researcher and participant and honestly describing the nature and use of the research to participants. The first study that I decided to analyze is: A researcher worked for a time on the production line of a large manufacturing plant. His status as a researcher was unknown to his co-workers. It was not until he was about to leave that he revealed his purpose and identity to others. This study was not done ethical because it violated some of the principles of ethical behaviors. The first violation was the researcher with holding his identity until after the study. This was a form of deception due to him not informing the participants in the beginning of his......

Words: 441 - Pages: 2

Harm Principle

...The Harm Principle allows for moral or legal interference only under one condition, to prevent harm to others. Actions and beliefs that are purely self-regarding and represent no threat of harm to others should be free from interference. “The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others”. Since harm is the main criteria for establishing the limits of state regulation and the extent of personal freedom, the concept must be clearly defined. In some cases this is done very smoothly. Acts that restrict the movement of others, cause physical injury or lead to loss of property, for instance, are subject to intervention as these consequences are uncontroversial examples of harm. But not all cases are so clear-cut. Mill himself acknowledges that even purely self-regarding actions can affect others, and it is uncertain at what point affect becomes harm. For example, a person’s religious opinions and right to discuss them should be considered immune from state interference. But expression of these views may well constitute blasphemy for others and in this sense may cause harm. Mill himself distinguishes between causing offence, which does not count as harm, and inciting violence, which is harmful and should be regulated, but the distinction is far from controversial. Other questions may also be asked of Mill’s conception of harm: can a person’s character be morally harmed? Can harm be......

Words: 2309 - Pages: 10

Discuss Whether Indirect Taxes on Petrol and Diesel Fuel in the Uk Should Be Reduced

...Discuss Whether Indirect Taxes on Petrol and Diesel Fuel in the UK should be reduced The main reason that a government imposes a taxes on fossil fuels is to try and correct for the negative externality (pollution) which is produced when they are consumed. Without the tax there would be a market failure as drivers would be over consuming petrol as they are not being charged for the damage to the environment. In order to order to answer this essay as to whether the tax should be reduced, I am going to focus on 3 aspects; those that lose from a reduction, those that gain from a reduction and finally at what level the overall price for petrol was BEFORE the tax reduction. In my conclusion I will show that this is key to deciding whether the tax should be lowered or not. The major argument for maintaining the level of taxation on petrol and diesel is to protect the environment. When the social costs of consuming a good are higher than the private costs, there is said to be a negative externality. As an individual consuming fuel is polluting the environment for all, then it can be seen that fuel produces a negative externality. This is illustrated in diagram 1 below. This shows that without any government intervention, the market equilibrium would consume Qp at price Pp. This is higher than the social equilibrium, Qs, meaning there has been a welfare loss to society of (shade triangle). Government fix this by imposing an indirect tax on producers, which effectively raises their......

Words: 1254 - Pages: 6

Discuss Whether Indirect Taxes on Petrol Should Be Reduced

...Discuss whether indirect taxes on petrol should be reduced Petrol is seen as a de-merit good as it can cause market failure as the free market may fail to take into account the negative externalities of consumption (pollution) because the social cost exceeds the private cost. Consumers too may experience imperfect information about the long term costs to themselves of consuming products deemed to be de-merit goods By imposing indirect tax on producers it raises their costs of production, shifting their supply curve inwards. If they have set the tax at the right level, this internalises the externality. By doing this the price of fuel will go up and so reduce the amount consumed and therefore reducing the negative externality which is pollution. It also provides incentives to reduce the negative externality such as pollution. E.g. cars have become more fuel efficient It can also raise revenue for the government. One project could be investing in improving public transport , as this is a substitute for driving, and if it was improved it might give drivers an alternative to driving which would reduce the externality occurring in the first place. If the revenue was spent this way then all users of public transport would benefit, so those who currently use the bus and train would gain from the tax remaining high if that meant that their fares were cheaper (or service quality was better. They can also use the revenue to get rid of information failure regarding the......

Words: 420 - Pages: 2

Should We Be Allowed to Break the Law

...Should we be allowed to break the law? By: John Smith For: Date: September 14, 2013 Philosophers, scholars, activists and judiciary officials, among others, have often concerned themselves with whether or not breaking the law can be justified. Some questions through which this query has been posed include, Should people be allowed to break the law? Should individuals be able to ignore the laws in which they do not believe? Can breaking the law ever be justified, morally or ethically? In his situation, King discusses how many other countries are moving forward in how they develop and treat others. He criticizes the United States as they creep forward with the pace of a horse and buggy when it comes to civil rights. He discusses how those who were not while have been lynched, beaten, killed, prosecuted, turned away from and denied access to certain places and ridiculed with mean language. King and his followers supported the de-segregation laws which opened up schools to children of all colors, but broke laws that he did not agree with and, to clarify, he separated the laws into those which are just and those which are unjust. To promote his point, he quoted St. Augustine as saying, “An unjust law is no law at all,” as it is not rooted in eternal and natural law (King, 2013). It is likely that there are situations in which breaking the law would be justifiable, as proposed by King, as well as many others. Some, such as John Rawls, have set forth......

Words: 647 - Pages: 3

Should Be Marihuana's Law Be Approved?

...information could be disclosed for "valid” medical or law enforcement purposes. 4) Pot-smoking: Public Pot-smoking can be regulated just as cigarette smoking is regulated. Calling it medicine does not confer the right to use pot anywhere. 5) Drivers: Driving under the influence of "medical" marijuana would still be illegal, as with alcohol. Supporters says that this issue is going to depend on three key aspects: Quantity / Quality and Consistency. However, is intended that this is a business of hundreds of millions of dollars a year if law makers decide to tax it, therefore there is no reason to imply that there are going to be restrictions when it comes to the way that this medical marihuana is going to be used (cannabis oil, cigarettes, tinctures, and cannabis-laced food products would be allowed). There are reasons to support the approval of this amend, but not once you reach that this amend states that whoever with a credential can possess marihuana based on what is "reasonably presumed to be an adequate supply.'' Patients who think they need more could appeal. And also when it seems that there is no uniformity and this amend is leaving a gap when says “debilitating conditions”, that may mean a simply headache or even a glaucoma. In addition, this amend is going to provide legal immunity to care-givers and doctors, which may be also a problem if they act irresponsibly. And finally, this amend violates the federal law and is constitution not limited. Even......

Words: 679 - Pages: 3

Gun Law Should Be Revoked

...(Persuasive speech: Gun Law Should Be Revoked) By: David Mikombo Submitted To: Professor Keondra Mitchell In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Business Communications Management 3030-801 Online September 12, 2015 As a native African, growing up I always dreamed of coming to America that was the dream that my brothers, my friends and I had. Watching the movies and dreaming of living the American Dream, we were told that America is the best country in the world, the land of opportunities. There is no country like America “Uncle Sam Needs You”, yes my childhood was just filled with the hopes that one day I’d make it to the greatest nation/ empire on the planet. I was told the crime rates and killings were very low and I liked the sound of that. In 2007 God Almighty opened up a way for my family and I to come to America and now that was what you call a dream come true for me. Greetings to you all my name is David Mikombo that was just a background for you all to understand my feelings as to why the “Gun Law” should be revoked. On April 16, 2007, a Virginia Tech student named Seung-Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people, in total he gunned down 56 before he took his own life ( On November 5, 2009, Army psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan at Fort Hood army base in Texas, fired killing 13 people and wounded 29 ( On August 3, 2010, Omar S. Thornton opened fire at a beer distributor in Manchester,......

Words: 1077 - Pages: 5

To What Extent Should the Law Reflect a Moral Vision, Even When This Involves an Interference with the Rights of Individuals Who Might Disagree with That Vision?”

...“To what extent should the law reflect a moral vision, even when this involves an interference with the rights of individuals who might disagree with that vision?” The relationship between the law and morality is one which has been a source of discussion and controversy for a whole host of reasons. It can be argued that although it is fundamentally futile for a particular moral vision to not influence law making, is it just for one’s perception of what is morally right to hinder the rights of others who may not share such moral visions? In a democracy, we the people decide who makes the laws for us – preferably the laws should reflect the moral vision of the people who we choose to represent us. However, due to the complex nature of morality the value system of the people tends to be varied. Thus, the law does not please everybody and as a result the rights of some individuals are hindered due to the contrasting moral vision of others. The purpose of this essay is to explore the way in which abortion as an issue is one which has been greatly affected by adverse moral visions. As a result, the rights of individuals in Ireland who may disagree with that vision have been affected. The Enactment of the 8th Amendment. The lawfulness of abortion under the constitution of Ireland can be considered as a topic which has sparked much debate between dissimilar views on abortion and bodily autonomy in Ireland. Kingston wrote that before the insertion of the eight amendment into......

Words: 2050 - Pages: 9

Should Immigration Laws Be Reformed

...Maitri A Shah English 4/12/2016 Should immigration laws be reformed Promising freedom and opportunity, the United States attracts individuals to come to the USA. But the current immigration system in the united states is broken: families are isolated, immigration workers are exploited, people die trying to cross the border, and there is rampant discrimination. The government should be for reforming immigration laws because it keeps families together and creates rational process of citizenship for new Americans etc. The first reason why immigration should be reformed is economy benefits by immigration reforms. Immigration reform would increase U.S. GDP by at least 0.84 percent. According to the American immigration council, “This would translate into at least a $1.5 trillion cumulative increase in GDP over 10 years, which includes approximately $1.2 trillion in consumption and $256 billion in investment”. Second, immigration system can uphold children’s basic human rights and ensure access to critical public services, programs, and economic supports for children and their families. It can ensure that children receive legal representation before all immigration authorities and, for all unaccompanied children, the appointment of an independent child advocate from the moment of detention throughout the course of any immigration or other related court proceedings. The other reason is it keeps family together Under today’s broken immigration system,......

Words: 364 - Pages: 2

Discuss Whether Indirect Taxes on Sugary Food and Drink Should Be Increased

...Discuss whether indirect taxes on sugary food and drink should be increased An indirect tax is a tax where the burden of the tax falls largely on the consumer but it is actually paid by the producer. Examples include Value Added Tax, excise duty and sales taxes. Indirect taxes on sugary food and drink will increase costs for producers so they cause the supply curve to shift to the left. The cost of the negative externalities is internalised in the price of the good, this may reduce demand for the good and the level of its production, eating sugary food and drink will increase the likelihood of obesity, early death, depression and certain heart disease. Poor health will also adversely affects work and productivity. Higher prices would discourage people from consuming unhealthy foods. Reducing consumption of sugary foods would have a significant impact in improving health. Also, adding tax on sugar can create an incentive for firms to supply alternatives which are healthier. If firms have incentives to promote healthier foods and drinks with substantially lower sugar content, then consumers will to an extent follow the supply. Moreover, taxes raise revenue for government, this can be spent on alternatives like tax on cigarettes could be used for funding government services to help people to stop smoking. However, it is difficult to measure the level of negative externality. Demand for sugary and drink tend to be price inelastic, so higher taxes will not reduce demand much.......

Words: 442 - Pages: 2

Should Parents Be Held Reponsible If Their Children Breaks the Law?

...Should parents be held responsible if their children breaks the law? Should children be punished for what they have done? I do not think parents should be held responsible because if the parent did not contribute to it then why should they be responsible because what their child have done. I think it should just be on the child. Depending on certain emotional, environment and aging levels. Every parent and child are different because they are different people. (England) No matter how the parent raised the child to know right from wrong, the child will still use his/her own brain and do what they want to do. The Parental Responsibility Law is made to stop some of violence and problems with younger children. Which, I do not think at all will stop them. It will have to take a community or more than just the community to stop the violence and trouble with the younger generation. But it all starts with us, the people. What are Parental Responsibilities? Parental Responsibilities is a set of rights and privileges that the U.S. Supreme Court has held parents to have a fundamental right to rear their children without undue interference by the government. But, also the court upheld the power of states to force parents to ensure that their children attend school. So, parenting is by no means an unfettered right and, as with many rights, it carries significant legal responsibilities. (Marinaccio) Usually, parental responsibilities include both "parenting time" and "decision-making......

Words: 2184 - Pages: 9

Why Abortion Laws Should Be Changed for Teens

...Teens and the outcome based on the laws on minors and abortion If you had a teenage daughter, how would you feel if she came home and said she was pregnant? Many teens fear to bring home a bad report card, getting in trouble at school, or even bringing home the boyfriend. Although, these are reasonable fears, the fear of telling your parents you’re pregnant at 13 is greater. Often the answer to teenage pregnancy is abortion, or illegal abortion. In many states, abortion is difficult to receive without parental consent. The laws that state this make it harder on the pregnant teen and unborn baby. If teen abortion was allowed without parental consent, there would be a lower mortality rate of teen moms and babies. Sadly, the age of sexually active teens lowers each year. When there is an unplanned pregnancy, teens are scared, and unsure as what to do. When abortion is considered it is a choice normally influenced by where she lives, beliefs, friends, fear of telling parents, abuse, if there are any places for teens to go for pregnancy, and even situations involving the pregnancy. Abortion is a tough subject for many. I myself do not believe in having an abortion, but that does not mean I’m against others in having the choice. There are places teens can go to get help in whatever they decide to do. Planned Parenthood Federation of America is one place that teens can go to and get the advice and help with whatever choice they may make. This is their statement on abortion,...

Words: 1061 - Pages: 5