Virginia Pollard

In: Business and Management

Submitted By np4kings
Words 21997
Pages 88
Name removed. GM 520- Week 2 Assignment

Assignment: Pick an administrative agency of either the Federal or a State government. Find where the current and proposed regulation changes for that agency are located on the internet. (i.e. the Federal Register or the State Administrative Agency website.) Regulations.gov is a good place to begin your research. Pick one proposed regulation change currently under consideration (if you find one which has already closed out, but interests you, you can use that, instead) and write the following regarding it: 1. State the administrative agency which controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interests you (briefly). Will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? If so, how? Submit a copy of the proposed regulation along with your responses to these five questions. The proposed regulation can be submitted as either a separate Word document (.doc) or Adobe file (.pdf). This means you will submit two attachments to the Week 2 Dropbox: (1) a Word doc with the questions and your answers and (2) a copy of the proposed regulation you used for this assignment. (10 points) 2. Describe the proposal/change. (10 points) 3. Write the public comment which you would submit to this proposal. If the proposed regulation deadline has already passed, write the comment you would have submitted. Explain briefly what you wish to accomplish with your comment. (10 points) 4. Provide the "deadline" by which the public comment must be made. (If the date has already passed, please provide when the deadline was). (5 points) 5. a. Once you have submitted your comment, what will you be legally entitled to do later in the promulgation process (if you should choose to do so)? (See the textbook's discussion of the Administrative Procedure Act.) b. If the proposal passes, identify and explain…...

Similar Documents

Pollard Case Study

...negatively impacts on his/her ability to do the job required of him/her. Was Pollard disparately treated? Pollard was disparately treated because her male colleagues like King who also committed the same offence were favourably treated (they were not fired as she was.) Disparate treatment This is a type of discrimination where the employer treats the employees differently based on factors like religion, tribe, gender or race. Difference between disparate treatment and disparate impact Whereas disparate treatment is concerned about the motive of the action taken, disparate impact focuses on the result of that action regardless of the motive behind it. If a company policy has a more negative impact on one gender then regardless of whether the intention or not disparate impact is established. The existence of a sexual harassment policy does not provide a defence to Teddy’s in this case. Pollards case is on sexual discrimination regarding her firing and therefore a policy on sexual harassment at the work place cannot be used as a defence. The defences to sexual harassment Teddy’s might have in the case. The existence of a policy against sexual harassment. This showed that the firm was aware of the problem and had put in place the mechanisms to combat it. The failure of Pollard to report her case following the laid down procedures as required by this policy. This removes liability from Teddy’s. Had Pollards replacement been female her case would have been made more......

Words: 353 - Pages: 2

Virginia Pollard

...You Decide Project Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy Supplies, a family-owned chain of film production equipment supply stores in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. During a routine performance evaluation, Virginia's supervisor at Teddy's complained that she made too many personal phone calls when she worked in the West Orange store. The supervisor noted this on Virginia's annual review, and warned her to keep personal calls to a bare minimum while at work. Soon thereafter, Teddy transferred Pollard to guard film equipment in the main warehouse behind the storefront; Virginia couldn't make personal calls there, and her work became exemplary. Her performance evaluation three months after her transfer was "meeting expectations" with no negative comments. Virginia Pollard was the only woman working in the warehouse, and she was often the victim of pranks perpetrated by her six male colleagues. Her co-workers taped her drawers shut, locked her out of the guard shack she sat in to watch the inventory, filled the guard shack with trash, and backed a forklift up to the door and made it backfire in her ear. One day a Teddy delivery driver sat in Pollard's chair and, when she tried to push him out of it, he bent her over his lap and spanked her. Pollard's new supervisor, Steve King, rarely enforced Teddy's rules against smoking, horseplay, foul language, and sexual harassment, and often indulged in such behaviors himself. Teddy's had a written sexual harassment policy...

Words: 2757 - Pages: 12

Virginia

...Representing Virginia I believe that the candidate that will have an easier time winning votes for the U.S. Senate in November 2012 would be Tim Kaine. I believe that he will have an easier time because he was Virginia’s governor from January 14, 2006 through January 16, 2010. His name is fresher in peoples mind than George Allen and Jamie Radtke. Most voters really only pay attention to the presidential elections and aren’t really concern who their congressmen or governor are. Therefore during any election other than the presidential election people tend to vote for the person who they have heard of. George Allen was the governor of Virginia back in 1994 through 1998, but as stated before Tim Kaine is fresher in peoples mind. Tim Kaine is from the democrat party. If I had to choose between a Republican and Democrat, I would most likely pick the Democrat. To me the Democrats tend to help the “common man” and look to save money. Republicans on the other hand tend to help the upper class people and are all about spending money. Since we are in a recession we need to spend and get back on the right path. Another issue that I like about Tim Kaine is that he plans to help education in Virginia. Since education is very important for our future generations, we don’t need to make cuts there. On Tim Kaine’s website he stated that, “Despite a tough economy, my administration made education investments a priority because we knew the positive affect an educated workforce can have......

Words: 543 - Pages: 3

Virginia Apgar

...important to today’s healthcare. Even though some contributions have progressed over time due to new-age technology, there is still the basic concepts from where it started. Dr. Virginia Apgar impacted the advancement of public health with the creation of the Apgar Score, also known as the newborn scoring. The Apgar Score is a quick test that is performed on a baby at 1 and 5 minutes after birth to determine how well the baby tolerated the birthing process (Zieve, 2011). Virginia Apgar was determined to be a doctor right out of high school after having to encounter the deaths of both of her brothers. One which had a chronic illness and the other experienced an early death from tuberculosis (“Changing the face”). She first put herself through school through school at Mt. Holyoke College with a BA in Zoology, she then attended Columbia University’ College of Physicians and Surgeons graduating in 1933, and later attending Johns Hopkins where she earned her Master’s Degree in Public Health ("Fond memories of," 1975). Even though individuals (such as Dr. Alan Whipple, the Chair of Surgery at Columbia University) saw the potential in Virginia, not one believed that she would be able to have a successful career due to the fact that she was a woman in the New York area around the 1950s (“Changing the face”). Virginia, then went on to have training in anesthesia, where at this time anesthesiologists were not seen as equals to surgeons. Since they were not respected as so, they......

Words: 853 - Pages: 4

Virginia Pollard Case

...Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy's Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy’s Supplies, a family-owned chain of film production equipment supply stores in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. During a routine performance evaluation, Virginia's supervisor at Teddy's complained that she made too many personal phone calls when she worked in the West Orange store. The supervisor noted this on Virginia's annual review, and warned her to keep personal calls to a bare minimum while at work. Soon thereafter, Teddy transferred Pollard to guard film equipment in the main warehouse behind the storefront; Virginia couldn't make personal calls there, and her work became exemplary. Her performance evaluation three months after her transfer was "meeting expectations" with no negative comments. Virginia Pollard was the only woman working in the warehouse, and she was often the victim of pranks perpetrated by her six male colleagues. Her co-workers taped her drawers shut, locked her out of the guard shack she sat in to watch the inventory, filled the guard shack with trash, and backed a forklift up to the door and made it backfire in her ear. One day a Teddy delivery driver sat in Pollard's chair and, when she tried to push him out of it, he bent her over his lap and spanked her. Pollard's new supervisor, XXXXX XXXX, rarely enforced Teddy's rules against smoking, horseplay, foul language, and sexual harassment, and often indulged in such behaviors himself.......

Words: 1512 - Pages: 7

Pollard Case

...Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy's Supplies, a family-owned chain of film production equipment supply stores in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. During a routine performance evaluation, Virginia's supervisor at Teddy's complained that she made too many personal phone calls when she worked in the West Orange store. The supervisor noted this on Virginia's annual review, and warned her to keep personal calls to a bare minimum while at work. Soon thereafter, Teddy transferred Pollard to guard film equipment in the main warehouse behind the storefront; Virginia couldn't make personal calls there, and her work became exemplary. Her performance evaluation three months after her transfer was "meeting expectations" with no negative comments. Virginia Pollard was the only woman working in the warehouse, and she was often the victim of pranks perpetrated by her six male colleagues. Her coworkers taped her drawers shut, locked her out of the guard shack she sat in to watch the inventory, filled the guard shack with trash, and backed a forklift up to the door and made it backfire in her ear. One day, a Teddy delivery driver sat in Pollard's chair and, when she tried to push him out of it, he bent her over his lap and spanked her. Pollard's new supervisor, Steve King, rarely enforced Teddy's rules against smoking, horseplay, foul language, and sexual harassment and often indulged in such behaviors himself. Teddy's had a written sexual harassment policy that included...

Words: 740 - Pages: 3

Virginia Elections

...The elections for governor of Virginia in 2013 attracted attention because of the negative campaign with personal attacks from both of the candidates Terry McAuliffe (D) and Ken Cuccinelli (R). The media were quick to pick up on the political platforms of each candidate and started building up news stories. Terry McAuliffe is a known businessman that has been involved in the Democratic Party for quite a long time serving as a chairman of the Democratic National Committee from 2001 to 2005. McAuliffe also was a co-chairman of President Bill Clinton’s re-election campaign and also was chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. McAuliffe’s first run for office was in the 2009 Virginia gubernatorial election where he did not win the democratic nomination (Biopgraphy Terry McAuliffe). On the other hand, Ken Cuccinelli was a more experienced politician, having been elected in the Virginia Senate in 2002 and 2007. In 2009 Cuccinelli was elected Attorney General of Virginia. During his time as an Attorney General, Cuccinelli was very vocal about his extreme right-wing like views on LGBT rights, climate change, immigration, and health care. He drew a lot of public attention and was often a subject of discussion in the media outlets (Senator Ken Cuccinelli). The start of the campaign was slow until The Washington Post (WAP) uncovered the relationship of governor McDonnell (R) with Jonnie Williams, the CEO of Star Scientific, a nutritional supplement company (The......

Words: 827 - Pages: 4

Virginia Pollard

...to consult on this case during the appeal. You Decide ES Review the Virginia Pollard case information located at the beginning of this project: You Decide ES. (If you click here, you will return to the face-sheet of the project area. To return to this page, click the Begin button again. You can do this all week.) To do well on this project, study the readings for this week and consider the work we did in Week 5. You may want to do some outside research for this project as well, reviewing recent case law on discrimination and harassment and including that in your answers to the project. Do not discuss this project with your classmates. You should do the work on your own. This project is "pooled," meaning your classmates may have different questions than you do. This project is worth 100 points toward your final grade. You can access this area all week and continue updating your answers until the end of the week – be sure to hit "save answers" before leaving each time! When you are done working on the project, hit "Submit for grade," and then it will be available in the grade book for grading. Your role in answering the questions: You are the independent human resources consultant hired by Teddy's Supplies to help explain to the company what the case against them will entail. You have gleaned the facts from your investigations into the situation to date. You have never talked with Virginia Pollard. The case is currently in the appeals stage and the company executives......

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Virginia Pollard

...In response to the request on potential liability to the sexual harassment case brought by Virginia Pollard, the company is vicariously liable for the conduct of its employees even though there is a sexual harassment policy in place. Virginia had become a victim of a hostile work environment supported by a supervisor with immediate authority over the employee. Pollard was working in a very stressful environment in which she (being the only female) was a minority being subjected to inappropriate language and other unwanted and uninvited behavior. Pollard was humiliated on a daily basis (i.e. pranks involving taping her drawers shut, locking her out of the guard shack, having a forklift backing up to the guard shack and backfiring into her ear) and also upset with the lack of support from her manager. In one incident Mr. King and the other warehouse workers put a sign on a truck that read "HARDHAT REQUIRED/BRA OPTIONAL." King and another employee called Pollard over to look at the sign and encouraged her to do as it said. This clearly indicates that Mr. King had knowledge of the harassment. Mr. King’s conduct was sufficiently serious to alter the conditions of Ms. Pollard’s employment and constitute an abusive working environment. Teddy’s Supplies can be held liable for the harassment of its supervisory employees because the harassment was pervasive enough to support an inference that the employer had "knowledge, or constructive knowledge" of it; under traditional agency......

Words: 2958 - Pages: 12

Pollard Virginia Words

...Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy’s Supplies, a family-owned chain of film production equipment supply stores in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. During a routine performance evaluation, Virginia's supervisor at Teddy's complained that she made too many personal phone calls when she worked in the West Orange store. The supervisor noted this on Virginia's annual review, and warned her to keep personal calls to a bare minimum while at work. Soon thereafter, Teddy transferred Pollard to guard film equipment in the main warehouse behind the storefront; Virginia couldn't make personal calls there, and her work became exemplary. Her performance evaluation three months after her transfer was "meeting expectations" with no negative comments. Virginia Pollard was the only woman working in the warehouse, and she was often the victim of pranks perpetrated by her six male colleagues. Her co-workers taped her drawers shut, locked her out of the guard shack she sat in to watch the inventory, filled the guard shack with trash, and backed a forklift up to the door and made it backfire in her ear. One day a Teddy delivery driver sat in Pollard's chair and, when she tried to push him out of it, he bent her over his lap and spanked her. Pollard's new supervisor, Steve King, rarely enforced Teddy's rules against smoking, horseplay, foul language, and sexual harassment, and often indulged in such behaviors himself. Teddy's had a written sexual harassment policy which......

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Virginia W4

...FORM VA-4 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PERSONAL EXEMPTION WORKSHEET (See back for instructions) 1 1. you wish to claim yourself, write “1”............................................................... ________________ If 2. you are married and your spouse is not claimed If 0 n his or her own certificate, write “1”................................................................ ________________ o 3. Write the number of dependents you will be allowed to claim 0 your income tax return (do not include your spouse).................................... ________________ on 1 4. Subtotal Personal Exemptions (add lines 1 through 3)...................................... ________________ 5. Exemptions for age 0 (a) I _f you will be 65 or older on January 1, write “1”................................... ________________ (b) I _f you claimed an exemption on line 2 and your spouse 0 w _ ill be 65 or older on January 1, write “1”............................................. ________________ 6. Exemptions for blindness 0 (a) I _f you are legally blind, write “1”............................................................ ________________ (b) I _f you claimed an exemption on line 2 and your 0 s _ pouse is legally blind, write “1”............................................................ ________________ 0 7. Subtotal exemptions for age and blindness (add lines 5 through 6).....

Words: 1102 - Pages: 5

Virginia Pollard

...Review the Virginia Pollard case information located at the beginning of this project: You Decide ES. (If you click here, you will return to the face-sheet of the project area. To return to this page, click the Begin button again. You can do this all week.) To do well on this project, study the readings for this week and consider the work we did in Week 5. You may want to do some outside research for this project as well, reviewing recent case law on discrimination and harassment and including that in your answers to the project. Do not discuss this project with your classmates. You should do the work on your own. This project is "pooled," meaning your classmates may have different questions than you do. This project is worth 100 points toward your final grade. You can access this area all week and continue updating your answers until the end of the week – be sure to hit "save answers" before leaving each time! When you are done working on the project, hit "Submit for grade," and then it will be available in the grade book for grading. Your role in answering the questions: You are the independent human resources consultant hired by Teddy's Supplies to help explain to the company what the case against them will entail. You have gleaned the facts from your investigations into the situation to date. You have never talked with Virginia Pollard. The case is currently in the appeals stage and the company executives have some questions for you. Answer them using the most recent......

Words: 2489 - Pages: 10

Virginia

...Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy’s Supplies, a family-owned chain of film production equipment supply stores in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.  During a routine performance evaluation, Virginia's supervisor at Teddy's complained that she made too many personal phone calls when she worked in the West Orange store.  The supervisor noted this on Virginia's annual review, and warned her to keep personal calls to a bare minimum while at work.  Soon thereafter, Teddy transferred Pollard to guard film equipment in the main warehouse behind the storefront; Virginia couldn't make personal calls there, and her work became exemplary. Her performance evaluation three months after her transfer was "meeting expectations" with no negative comments. Virginia Pollard was the only woman working in the warehouse, and she was often the victim of pranks perpetrated by her six male colleagues. Her co-workers taped her drawers shut, locked her out of the guard shack she sat in to watch the inventory, filled the guard shack with trash, and backed a forklift up to the door and made it backfire in her ear. One day a Teddy delivery driver sat in Pollard's chair and, when she tried to push him out of it, he bent her over his lap and spanked her. Pollard's new supervisor, Steve King, rarely enforced Teddy's rules against smoking, horseplay, foul language, and sexual harassment, and often indulged in such behaviors himself.  Teddy's had a written sexual harassment policy which......

Words: 1307 - Pages: 6

Virginia Pollard Case

...A. Define sexual harassment, including both quid pro quo and hostile environment harassment. Which type(s) do you feel Pollard was a victim of (if either)? Provide law or a case to support your position. If you feel Pollard was not a victim of harassment in this case, explain why you feel that way, and provide law or a case to support your position. Sexual harassment is defined as, “Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that tends to create a hostile or offensive work environment.” Quid pro quo, “sexual harassment is the conditioning of employment benefits on an employee's sub-mission to unwelcome sexual conduct.” And, hostile environment harassment, “refers to a situation where employees in a workplace are subject to a pattern of exposure to unwanted sexual behavior from persons other than an employee's direct supervisor where supervisors or managers take no steps to discourage or discontinue such behavior.” In the Pollard case, I feel Teddy’s did allow for a hostile environment harassment to take place and took no means to enforce their “zero-tolerance” policy. Virginia’s direct supervisor (Mr. King) was just as culpable as her male co-workers with the unwanted verbal and sometime physical suggestions. However, her own account does not state that she received any type of benefit from King on behalf of the company for her allowance of said advances. In order to prove a sexual harassment case, the......

Words: 1072 - Pages: 5

Virginia the at Will State

...following provides an overview of federal and Virginia employment laws that could apply to social sector organizations and their employees located in Virginia. This overview does not provide a complete and comprehensive analysis of all potentially applicable employment laws in Virginia and the United States and it should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular a situation. At Will Employment The conventional relationship between an employer and an employee hired for an indefinite period of time is called “employment at will.” Under this arrangement and setting aside the potential applicability of a number of special laws, either the employer or the employee may terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause, and with or without advance notice. In the absence of a written contract or other evidence indicating that an employee may be terminated only “for cause,” employment is generally presumed to be at will. Virginia common law has established the employment at will doctrine, allowing an employer to fire an employee for any reason as long as it does not violate public policy. It is important to remember, however, that there are a number of special laws, both federal and state, that limit an employer’s unfettered right to terminate traditional “at will” employees. These laws, many of which are identified and discussed in the Federal Laws Regarding Employment and Other Virginia Specific Considerations sections,......

Words: 2146 - Pages: 9